Penjatuhan Pidana Tambahan Berupa Pembayaran Biaya Penanganan Perkara bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Authors

  • FIRA MUBAYYINAH FIRA IAI AL HIKMAH TUBAN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36840/jurnalstudikeislaman.v10i2.495

Keywords:

Pidana Tambahan, Biaya Penanganan Perkara

Abstract

This study focuses on additional criminal ideas in the form of payment of case handling fees for perpetrators of corruption. As normative legal research, this research uses a philosophical and legislative approach. This study reveals that payment of case handling fees is an important element in realizing the deterrent effect in sentencing. The more severe the punishment was given to the perpetrators of corruption is believed to reduce the desire and influence the decisions of potential perpetrators. The idea of ​​prevention requires the existence of criminal penalties. The high rate of corruption is alleged as result the lightness of the punishment given to the perpetrators of corruption.

 

References

AA GN Ari Dwipayana, 2006, Pembaharuan Sistem yang koruptif, Kerjasama Kaukus Parlemen Bersih, DIY – SKH KR, Majalah Kedaulatan Rakyat, tanggal 28 Nopember 2006, Kolom 3-5.

Arrob, T. “Decisioan making by chinese”. US. Journal of Social Psyhology Vol. 38. (1998).

Alfred A Knopf. Doing Justice A Prosecutor’s Thoughts on Crime, Punishment, and the Rule of Law, (New York : ree Bharara, 2019).

Adam Graycar & Prenzler, Understanding and Preventing Corruption. (London Palgrave Macmillan, 2013

Barda Nawawi Arief, Perkembangan Delik-delik khusus Dalam Mayarakat yang Mengalami Modernisasi. Simposium nasional BPHN-UNAIR. Surabaya.1980.

Barda Nawawi Arief, Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana, (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 1996)

Ben Jhonson, “Do Criminal Laws Deter Crime? Deterrence Theory in Criminal Justice Policy: A Primer. (Januari, 2019).

David Garland. Punishmen and modern society A study In social Theory. (USA: The University Of Chicago Press, 1990).

Douglas Husak. Over criminalization The Limits of The Criminal Law, (New York : Oxford University Press. 2008).

Edi O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-prinsip hukum pidana, Cetakan pertama, (Yogyakarta : cahaya Atma Pustaka,2014)

Hermin hadiati Koeswati. Perkembangan macam-macam pidana dalam rangka perkembangan Hukum pidana. (Jakarta : Citra Aditya. 1995).

Hariman Satria, “ Kebijakan Kriminal Pencegahan Korupsi Pelayanan Publik” Jurnal Antikorupsi Integritas, 6 (2).

Interim Report. “The Effectiveness of Fines as a Sentencing Option: court-imposed fines and penalty notices”. (Sydeny: Oct, 2006). NSW Sentencing Council.

Jan Remmelink. Hukum Pidana Komentar atas Psala-pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003)

KPK, Undang-undang No. 31 thn 1999 jo UU No. 20 thn 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Cetakan pertama. (Jakarta : 2002).

Leonard Orland, Justice, Punishment, Treatment The Coerrectional Process, (Newyork: Free Press, 1973).

Mahrus Ali, Hukum Pidana Korupsi, (Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016)

Mardjono Reksodiputro, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Cet-1, (Depok: Raja Grafindo, 2020).

Marjono Reksodiputro, Menyelaraskan Pembaruan Hukum. (Jakarta: Komisi Hukum Nasional,2009).

Michelle Pifferi, Editor : Jill Peay dan Tim Newburn Reinventing Punishment A Comparative History of Criminology anda Penology in the 19th and 20th Century, (UK : Oxford Universty Press, 2016).

Moh Khasan. Reformulasi Teori Hukuman Tindak Pidana Korupsi menurut Hukum pidana islam. (Hasil penelitian anggaran DIPA-IAIN Walisongo Semarang. 2011)

Muhammad Taufik Makarao, Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Studi Tentang Bentuk-bentuk Pidana Khususnya Pidana Cambuk Sebagai Suatu Bentuk Pemidanaan. (Jogjakarta:Kreasi Wacana, 2005)

R. Wiyono. Pembahasan Undang-undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (Jakarta:Sinar Grafika, 2011)

Ronald L. Akers, Criminological Theories, Introduction and Evaluation, (Landon: Routledge, 2013),

Rimawan Pradiptio, Korupsi Mengorups, Cetakan pertama, (Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 2009)

Steven Shavell, “Economic Analysis of Public Law Enforcement and Criminal Law” (Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 2003)

Steven Shavell “ Economic Analysis of Public Law Enforcement and Criminal Law” Economic and Business Discussion Paper Series (Cambridge:Harvard University Press,2003)

T. Mathiesen, General Prevention as Communication dalam A Reader on Punishment. R.A. Duff and David Garland (Ed). (New York: Oxford University Press, Inc, 1995)

www.ajnn.net. “Bebani Koruptor dengan Biaya Sosial” dalam: https://www.ajnn.net/news/bebani-koruptor-dengan-biaya-sosial/index.html

Yudi Kristiana, Menuju Kejaksaan Progresif Studi Tentang Penyelidikan, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Tindak Pidana, (Yogyakarta: LSHP-Indonesia, 2009)

Downloads

Published

2021-12-04

How to Cite

FIRA, F. M. (2021). Penjatuhan Pidana Tambahan Berupa Pembayaran Biaya Penanganan Perkara bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. AT-TUHFAH: JURNAL STUDI KEISLAMAN, 10(2), 15–40. https://doi.org/10.36840/jurnalstudikeislaman.v10i2.495